Technical SEO audit
Review status codes, robots directives, sitemaps, canonicals, redirects, mobile usability, structured data, internal discovery, and Core Web Vitals evidence.
A practical website SEO audit identifies the technical blockers, missed search demand, weak service pages, and authority gaps most likely to affect qualified traffic.
Not every crawler warning deserves immediate attention. We focus on issues that affect discovery, important service pages, user experience, or a realistic path to customer inquiries.
Review status codes, robots directives, sitemaps, canonicals, redirects, mobile usability, structured data, internal discovery, and Core Web Vitals evidence.
Group relevant searches by intent, inspect the live results, and map viable topics to a service page, helpful guide, comparison, or lead-generating asset.
Compare search competitors, pages earning visibility, referring-domain patterns, lost links, and assets that have a defensible reason to attract citations.
Yes. We review whether important service pages can be discovered, understood, and checked against evidence. GEO means generative engine optimization; here, it is a practical part of the website review.
Review crawl access, canonical URLs, internal links, visible service details, source links, and whether structured data agrees with the page. Separate a live-page check from indexing evidence in Search Console.
Identify missing buyer questions: who the service is for, what is included, what the next step costs or requires, and when it is a poor fit. Recommend specific edits with supporting URLs and a reason for each change.
Use a fixed set of buyer questions to record sampled AI mentions and citations, then track referral visits and qualified inquiries separately. No audit can promise an AI citation or a ranking date.
Google says there are no extra technical requirements or special schema for its AI search features. A page must be indexed and eligible for a snippet, and eligibility does not guarantee selection. Read Google's AI features guidance.
Before requesting a review, read the GEO evidence framework and the 30-day citation action plan. Share your website, main service, target customer, and the inquiry you want to receive through our contact form.
Small businesses often publish without knowing whether Google can interpret the offer, whether the page matches search intent, or whether competitors are winning with a different page type.
Confirm services, customers, locations, conversions, and the pages that matter.
Crawl the site and validate material findings against Search Console and live pages.
Score opportunities by value, demand, feasibility, confidence, and time to signal.
Fix quick wins first, then build the pages and authority needed for durable growth.
The review covers indexability, page structure, search intent, service-page gaps, internal links, local visibility where relevant, competitor patterns, and a prioritized implementation roadmap.
Tools support the research, but recommendations are reviewed against your services, target customers, search results, and business priorities.
Technical fixes may be observable after recrawling, while rankings and qualified traffic can take longer. Timing depends on competition, content, and authority, so no ranking date is guaranteed.
Share your site, target market, and current lead flow. We’ll respond with a practical starting point.
Read our holiday-hours checklist for a practical example of keeping business information, website content, and the inquiry path consistent.
For online retailers, our AI shopping product-data checklist shows how to check the product page, feed, and checkout against the same facts.